Xu Zhifeng's exile, unexpectedly brought up another phenomenon that happened many times in the past year: online Jin Tianyi. At one point, a whole bunch of "analyses" appeared asking why he didn't transfer assets in advance, didn't have any preparations, and so on. In the past, there were students engaged in activities, and the real refugees in Chungking Mansions were invited to share, but no one was brave enough to ask them such questions.
The only relevant thing is that some students asked why they chose to come to Hong Kong, and I remember one of them replied: "I only had one day between my life and death, and when I got to the airport, I thought I was going to remove background from image flee to the UK. ; The connector gave me a Hong Kong ticket, and I didn't even know where Hong Kong was at that time, but you said I couldn't get on the plane?" For many things, the client is more nervous than you, and others can actually say a few words less. This is not an isolated phenomenon. In the past year, there have been many kinds of "analyses" on the Internet, and there have been many questioning each other.
I'm putting the word "analysis" in quotation marks, because these discussions hardly qualify as real analysis, after all, they often miss or get the basic facts wrong. I understand that today, everyone really wants to continue "doing things". You don’t have to go to the street. Being online Jintianyi can get you a lot of sense of participation; however, it will also bring a lot of misjudgment and damage. Zhongji doesn't remember the three words "Quiet Chicken"? If you really have first-hand information and you can help people, such as giving evidence in a coroner's inquest, of course you can do it. , do a professional investigation. As for the news or pictures on the Internet, it is not easy to share, so be cautious. This can also be a kind of "quiet chicken".